The Great American Conspiracy Theory

msufan · 11-19-2005, 10:53 AM

Poet -- read that paper that CIO linked about the explosives. What points do you disagree with? Your question is about the why of it all: why would the US government do that? Why wouldn't it be the jihadists?

But when you look at the specifics of what happened, the HOW becomes quite difficult to refute. HOW did 7 fall, how did the towers implode symmetrically on their own footprints, how did people hear explosions coming from the basement of buildings, how did people suffer severe burns in the basement immediately after impact when it was the upper floors that were hit, etc., etc.

CIO is right -- no one seems to be able to refute the "How" questions, so everyone attacks the "why" ones.

11-19-2005, 10:53 AM	#84 (permalink)
msufan 5,000+ posts Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 5,163 Mark Dantonio	Poet -- read that paper that CIO linked about the explosives. What points do you disagree with? Your question is about the why of it all: why would the US government do that? Why wouldn't it be the jihadists? But when you look at the specifics of what happened, the HOW becomes quite difficult to refute. HOW did 7 fall, how did the towers implode symmetrically on their own footprints, how did people hear explosions coming from the basement of buildings, how did people suffer severe burns in the basement immediately after impact when it was the upper floors that were hit, etc., etc. CIO is right -- no one seems to be able to refute the "How" questions, so everyone attacks the "why" ones.