Quote:
|
Originally Posted by msufan
Poet -- read that paper that CIO linked about the explosives. What points do you disagree with? Your question is about the why of it all: why would the US government do that? Why wouldn't it be the jihadists?
But when you look at the specifics of what happened, the HOW becomes quite difficult to refute. HOW did 7 fall, how did the towers implode symmetrically on their own footprints, how did people hear explosions coming from the basement of buildings, how did people suffer severe burns in the basement immediately after impact when it was the upper floors that were hit, etc., etc.
CIO is right -- no one seems to be able to refute the "How" questions, so everyone attacks the "why" ones.
|
That's a fair statement. So then let's have full investigation, with unbiased scientific professionals conducting the study (no politicians) who have nothing to gain or lose by exposing the facts. Maybe I'd be surprised, but I can't help but think when the study was completed, they would find that building 7 fell due to the planes flying into the first two towers and the intense heat from the burning jet fuel. But let them do an investigation. However, you know as well as I do that when the study was completed, there would be a whole new wave of conspiracy theories about the study itself.