Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wingfanjim
However, the circumstances that lead to the collapse of towers 1 and 2 seem pretty concrete and conspiracy theory doesn't hold water.
|
1 and 2 fell too fast (free fall) for the pancaking theory. Everything was turned to DUST.
The elevators ran in sections, there was no shaft from top to bottom. The shafts only went 1/3 of the way up then you got on a new elevator, so NO, no fuel ran down the shats to the basement.
The fire was so hot there are pictures of people standing in the burning hole.
but the steel, that couldn't take the heat.
The panckaking theory is FULL of major holes.
Contrary to your post, WTC 1 and 2 were supported in the middle by 47 (?) giant steel columns. All of which were seemingly disintegrated FROM the TOP of the BOTTOM... odd.
I don't know Jim, but don't be so sure that the Popular Mechanics, NOVA, FEMA and 9/11 Commission version of what happened to WTC 1 and 2 is true. It was all written by pretty much the same guy and avoids a lot of important evidence...
- Free Fall (Not possible w/o explosives)
- Molten Metal (Not possible w/o explosives)
- Explosions Reported / Burn Victims
- Everything turned to very fine particulates (unlikely w/o explosives).
- Symmetrical collapse (Unlikely w/o explosives)
- "Interesting Squibs" in the video. (Who knows, but the only explanation for them is explosives)
NOW THAT ^^^ IS A STEEL MELTING FIRE.