Quote:
Originally Posted by SpartanStu
Next years group of guys will tell us volumes more about the where our program is headed. This year he made sure he got guys that will help fill the holes that held us back (secondary), were weak (linebacker), and graduation (O-line).
|
That's all well and good, but what are the experts saying? Experts are the ones who know the needs of the team and how to coach them, right? Why the hell are we paying these coaches millions of dollars when all we need to do is get the opinion of an ex-mailman who started a entire cottage industry. That's who we should seek out - mailmen, butchers, golf course managers, unemployed journalists, gasbag radio talk show hosts, recuiting dorks on ESPNU, former coaches who FAILED at their job and were fired that now work at the Big 10 network - you know, all the people who REALLY know what's going on.
Experts are the ones who had recuits in camps and went to their games. Only the coaches watch grainy films and listen to rumors from other people to evaluate how many stars to give them
You morans out there that actually pay attention to these experts, realize when it comes to rankings, it's all about stars and NOT needs. Spartan Stu brings up the correct way to measure this class - we filled needs. Dantonio started his presser by clearly stating it's all about filling needs. But for you idots out there, it's all about how many stars. I'd rather have 3* linebackers/secondary/OL because we need them more than 4* RBs. Had we signed Ingram, we would have moved up in the rankings, but without the other signees, Ingram in and of himself does nothing. As for Perry - you can't win them all. Hell, if USC offered me, I would have gone there too.
Do I know how good this class is? I'll be the first to tell you I don't know s***. But I'm also putting my confidence in the people that actually get paid for it to do their job. Before posting a bunch of BS on what someone thinks of this class, just come back in 2/3 years - that's when we'll see if you're an expert.