Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch
|
Fletch,lets just agree to disagree,and this post i started yesterday,its not a new one..................
at the end of the day,here is what this comes down to
either you believe the govt...who..to this day has done a universally poor job of trying to explain what happened to this building...or in the case of its 9/11 commision..ignored it(makes anything they say real believable doesnt it)
or do you listen to eye witness reports,saying there were only fires on three or four floors(which were allowed to burn during the day with zero firefighting efforts)...look at the 6.2 second collapse into about a 70 yard debris field,with little but powdered dust left of the building...and the finding of steel beams in its basements that were way hotter than anything in that building could of ever been from fire.....
maybe i am different than most...i use my brain and dont take sides....when i look at a building like that,and read about the minimal damage to it..the owner of it says it was "pulled"the city allowed it to burn,without doing anything about it...and i look at video of squibs going up the side of it right before it came down.....i find the arguement for implosion way more credible than any other theory thats been offered...but thats just me