06-18-2007, 07:06 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Walk-On
 5,000+ posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: East Lansing
Posts: 9,116
 #23 Javon Ringer
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico Palazzo
why would NAMBLA be next? Since the key word in this argument is "consenting" that eliminates NAMBLA from the conversation as children under 18 (or 16, depending on the state) cannot legally consent.
By interjecting NAMBLA into the conversation are you comparing 2 consenting adults of different races who want to marry eachother out of love and devotion to one another to a pedophile and a young boy, or 2 consenting adults of the same sex who wish to do the same to a pedophile and a young boy?  |
Prejudice. 
__________________
“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.”
- Murray N. Rothbard
|
|
|