View Single Post
Old 08-03-2007, 10:01 AM   #33 (permalink)
chachi


helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 15,841

My Spartan is
Mark Dantonio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartamus Prime View Post
This is such BS.

Any structural engineer worth his salt knows that the tensile strength of steel is equal to 4 rem parts per mm of suspended weight.

In a bridge truss the strength of the bearing load is 4x= to the azimuth of the diagonal flow (23y to the 3rd power). So that means in order for a bridge with two trusses to collapse in 4 seconds the vertical sheer would have to be greater than 5x times the horizontal bearing load. Since it has been proven that high tensile strength steel can only withstand a breaking weight of 9 times its maximum progression load, that means the force of strength to cause the bridge to collapse as fast as it did would be = to the square root of 4 times the 1/3 quantity of the power ratio. Schulstein's 3rd law of engineering dynamics states that this is absolutely impossible and that a collapse of a < 4 magnitude has to have a significantly greater accelerate force ratio behind its negative impact vectors.

So scientifically your theory that his is some "accident" is so full of crap its unbelievable and only a significant outside force, like explosives, could cause a bridge to fails as quickly as this one did.
nice.

So... your last paragraph would also apply to all three WTC towers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sakimano View Post
I need practical application, dude.. I don't need a book..
chachi is offline
 
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13648 seconds with 9 queries