Quote:
Originally Posted by RelentlessSpartan
Does "whatever you could" mean within ethical boundaries? I sure hope so and for most businesses it does. Apparently for yours it does not.
For Martin Waymire it did not. They were deceitful. Schticks are not deceitful - at least not in a meaningful way. Apples and oranges.
Moreover, they were just stupid. I think many people would be open to listen to their arguments if they were presented logically and honestly.
Lastly, Trevor does have the final say here. He ought to, he owns it. Yet I do have something to say as I was a TARGET of the dishonest post and it is really not your place to say whether or not I should have an opionion.
|
What was unethical about this? Viral marketing (if this is an example) is everywhere and operates in this very same manner. It is done by every major corporation on the planet these days. Does that anger you in the same manner?
Either way, you are entitled to voice your opinion. As far as Trevor is concerned, my comment was not "giving permission", but a statement of fact. Would you react to other posts as vehemently and with as much personal outrage if you found out some other post was "dishonest"? In essence, the post was what we all post on here, an opinion. Whether it was a company or an individual, does it matter? Either agree or disagree. Take what you want from this board and leave what you don't.