Quote:
Originally Posted by IGGcitable
The funniest thing about the whole Britney "debate" (if there is one at this point  ) is that now a bunch of hand-wringing simps are going into a song-and-dance, "boo hoo, it's so nasty and cruel and unfair to make snotty comments about her body."
Well, whose goddamn idea was it for her to stuff her cottage-cheese ass and flopping honkers in fishnets, compression panties and a kevlar bra, and prance and dance across the stage on (at least in theory) national TV??
If she didn't want to be judged on her sagging ass and flubbery gut, all she had to do was to put on a pair of pants and maybe a loose shirt or something, and maybe hit the gym for about six more months if she really wanted to parade herself all over the place, but she didn't, so now we get this bull$#$# whining, like we're picking on some poor sweet innocent little girl or something.
   |
All questions about how good or not good she looks, her "performance" last night really shows how far gone she is mentally. This was supposed to be her big comeback, a chance to show a nationwide audience that "I've gone though some rough times, but I've made it through stronger and ready to go". Instead she gets up there, looks completely drugged, and does a show that William Hung, on a bad day, could easily top.
She might as well just stayed back in her suite and ordered a fifth of Grand Mariner and some jalapeno poppers and watched the show on TV and let the cameras film her doing that and it probably would have helped her career more.
How people can have so much and yet so little never ceases to amaze me.
Of course I could be all wrong and maybe she was off because she was worried about getting home and giving her sons their nightly bottle and tucking them into bed in a timely fashion.
