Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartanic
Seems like a lot of media effort the last few years has gone into trying to convince the American people that the WC got it right. Makes one wonder what the source is for all this.
|
A quest for the truth?
The realization that the conspiracy nut community has been feeding us lies, deceptions, and misreprentations?
A desire to have history reported as it happened, not as it was made up by nuts and loonies?
Quote:
|
Interesting story: Bugliosi had spent years writing his book. Before going to press, he found out that one of the key foundations for the case against LHO had been found to be false: The NAA analysis method used by Guinn on the bullet evidence was revealed to be seriously flawed. The study that revealed it was endorsed by the National Academy of Sciences, and authored by a long-time FBI metallurgist (in coordination with some other scientists). In response, The FBI stopped using these flawed analysis in 2003.
|
Misrepresenting again. You admit below that you haven't read the book but that doesn't stop you from distorting it.
The NAA analysis is NOT a key foundation of Bugliosi's case against Oswald. Bugliosi makes the point that there is so much evidence against Oswald that there is zero doubt of his guilt. In fact we do not need the NAA for this or even the Z-film
Quote:
|
To make a long story short, there is no way anyone can link the bullet evidence to LHO.
|
This statement can only be considered a lie.
It has been proven without a doubt that the bullet CE399 was fired from Oswalds rifle.
Quote:
|
I have not read the book yet, but it will be interesting to see how Bugliosi handles the rifle and bullet evidence in his quest to prove LHO was the lone assassin.
|
Its a great read Spart.
Keep in mind that Bugliosi is a well respected prosecuter, not a fly by night "expert" like your White and Groden.