View Single Post
Old 10-10-2007, 11:04 AM   #1304 (permalink)
Spartanic


helmet
5,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 6,365

My Spartan is
43 Eric Gordon
Comments on the Bugliosi Book (Fred Kuentz) Graphic:

1. The Graphic does not reference an actual Zapruder frame. The side note states "somewhere within a split second of frame z-210". This is basically saying the graphic is a "generic" reference to any frame from z-192 to z-228.
Magic Bullet Theorists have never been able to find a Zapruder frame where the Magic Bullet will work. Bugliosi tries to avoid this problem by simply not addressing it. The Z frame reference is very important regarding the trajectory of the bullet. As the Limo proceeds down Elm Street (away from the Snipers Nest) the Horizontal angle between the 6th floor window and the Limo is constantly changing. It is not possible for one trajectory to represent all the different trajectories during that frame sequence.
2. The location of the exit wound on JBC's front chest is roughly 4" away from the actual location of the exit wound. How many years did Bugliosi spend on this book? After all that time, he comes up with a bullet trajectory that misses Connally's chest exit wound.
3. The angle of the proposed path of the Magic Bullet is way off. By itself, this renders the graphic useless. With reference to the Limo, this graphic shows the bullet coming in at an 8 degree angle! This is not a true angle at any time during the sequence from z190 to z228. This is a shameless attempt at deception.
At z190, the angle is about 14 degrees. The angle decreases gradually to about 11.5 degrees at z228. We do not see an angle of 8 degrees until close to the headshot around z313.
4. JFK is "crammed" into the corner of the Limo. Note specifically how JFK is drawn as leaning on the top of the side of the vehicle with his armpit actually resting over the side of the Limo. There is no photo evidence to support JFK in this position during the specified z frame sequence. In the Zapruder frames, JFK is visible sitting in a relaxed, upright position with his elbow resting on the side of the Limo. There simply is no z frame or other photo during the shooting sequence that show his armpit on the side of the car. The motive here is obvious: Cram JFK as far to his right as possible to try and "steer" the bullet trajectory to the desired location.
To try and coverup this manipulation, the author gives JFK a larger-than-life upper body. At 6' and 170 pounds, JFK was a bit smaller than JBC, but you would not know that from this graphic. This graphic shows JFK with a wingspan that measures roughly 7 feet. That is the same wingspan as Idong Ibok on the basketball team.
5. This is not an accurate graphic of the Limo, but another "artistic rendering" of the Limo. .
Why do SBT authors refuse to use the readily available Blueprints of the Limo that have the exact measurements and proportions? The Limo provides a strategic reference system in the positioning of the the occupants and the trajectory of the Bullets. Manipulating the measurements and proportions of the Limo causes inaccuraces. A few inches off can have a big impact.
Example:
- The interior width of the limo is 3-4 inches short (about 56.5" when it should be 60"). These discrepancies are important because they illustrate a lack of attention to detail in a matter where the details are very important.

Summary: This graphic is intentionally deceptive. The horizontal angle of the bullet leads directly back to the Dal-Tex building, not the TSBD. JFK is stuffed into the corner of the back seat, several inches away from his actual position in the z frame photos. Even with these manipulations, the proposed bullet trajectory still fails to pass through Connallys known wounds. Bugliosi joins the list of authors (Specter, Lattimer, Posner, Meyers) who have intentionally manipulated evidence and lied to try and deceive their readers into accepting the Magic Bullet Theory.
__________________


Last edited by Spartanic; 10-11-2007 at 10:01 AM. Reason: Syntax and accuracy
Spartanic is offline
 
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.15327 seconds with 9 queries