Quote:
Originally Posted by jdbmst3k
You already posted his stats, which were worse than Jones, and now you've posted that his save percentage is worse than Jones.
|
Follow the discussion before offering such thoughts. Someone says Todd is good because he has a lot of saves. I disagree with that metric, but even if you accept it as true, Borowski has more saves so doesn't that logically follow that he's better than Jones under that argument?! I think it does.
Someone also says that Todd is good because of his save percentage and that this is the most effective metric for closers. I say I "strongly disagree" but even if you want to believe that it's true, Todd still comes out mediocre as that's what the stats indicate.
Simple to follow, simple to understand, and simple to see I'm right.........
