[EComCon]

Originally Posted by Al Czervik

Pretty entertaining.

They're probably right, only the guy the corporate masters won't let win is bulldog John Edwards. I don't think they'd have a problem with a lightweight guy like Obama.

Nearly 15 point shift from last night's polls to today's vote, with unaudited Diebold scanners?
Well Diebold won again
ALL Diebold, ALL the Time - It's the NH Primary
The BRAD BLOG : NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama

Brad Friedman makes some good points

Here's a screenshot of a round up of all of the latest polls from RealClearPolitics.com tonight, and more, to get an idea of the serious concerns here...

They were all not just wrong, but wildly wrong. But only for the Clinton/Obama race.

For a closer look, here's Zogby's predicted numbers, for both the Republicans and Democrats:

And here are the latest numbers from the MSNBC website (the numbers seem to be identical over at CNN and elsewhere):

As you'll note, the numbers in Zogby's latest polls, for all but Clinton and Obama, seem to have been dead-on the money for both the Republicans and Democrats. Edwards, for example, was polled at 17% in Zogby's poll, and he received exactly 17% in the MSNBC numbers, with 63% of precincts reporting.

So are we to believe that only those voters who preferred Obama previously, decided to change to Hillary at the last minute?
Can You Count on Voting Machines?

The winning ticket: Hillary and Diebold in 2008