Quote:
Originally Posted by Topopo
Wow so we get who? Two RBs or both the WRs and Sims? Seems a bit ambitious but I like the optimism.
|
i take that statement back from that top 10...i didnt look at it that close because I looked at other ones that had more than 4 rbs/2qbs/2 wrs/etc. now looking at it closely I think 5 is about right...maybe 4 and a slight chance of 6.