Quote:
Originally Posted by DantonIzzo
This may have been addressed a while back (I just watched the first two episodes tonight -- just haven't had time), but in the opener, when the camps were dividing up, my wife pointed out that Hurley started talking about Charlie as if everyone knew what happened to him. He looked at Jack and started in on the "dying for nothing" bit, but at that point, Jack had no idea Charlie had died or how he died, correct?
I just thought that was a major whiff on the part of the writers, considering only a select few at that point knew Charlie was gone, and even fewer actually knew how he died and for what supposed cause.
 |
Going back an episode, here's the major whiff that annoyed me:
Locke throws the knife into Naomi, and no one (especially Jack the doctor) checks to see her condition, or maybe just maybe thinks about pulling the knife out of her. So, she lays there dying for what 15? 30? minutes before staggering off into the jungle.
Don't you think that Jack would have at least checked her out. Whatever, who cares.