Quote:
Originally Posted by sparty Inc
Ending up #47 according to rivals, and #56 according to scout, does not get it done. 1-11 Minnesota ended up #17 according to rivals. The Gophers must be selling the hell out of the new stadium. To turn the corner you have to get 4 star players like Perry, and Ingram. They shoud have 5-6 four star players every year, not just one. scUM had 15 4 star players, I think State should end up with 5-6 per season.
|
I'll refrain for now calling you a f'n idiot. So please read this carefully:
RIVALS or SCOUT or RECUITING PLANENT or SOME FAILED COACH ON THE BIG 10 NETWORK or ANYONE ELSE NOT NAMED DANTONIO don't know s***.
I don't know either. Let's wait until we see the new guys play before making any judgement. I have no idea if any of these recuits can compete at this level or whether they're all Big 10 Team caliber. Neither do you, neither do the recuiting expert assbags.
In the meantime, there's some very good threads on here that deal with recuiting rankings and their utter failure in predicting future results. Literally it's a 50/50 crapshot. Sometimes these rankings are absolutely laughable when you compare the rankings to the actual results.
Do your own research using Rivals Database - it's free and it's easy to use. Go back and look at the top recuiting classes over the past 5 years, then look at the final polls. Hint: Look at Mizzou or Va Tech rankings going back 5years. Compare their recuiting rankings to UM or Miami over the same time frame. Then look at how those teams finished this year. Draw your own conclusions.
If you come back here after doing 20 minutes of research on this board and Rivals and see if you still want to post something as ignorant as you did. If you do, I won't refrain from then calling you a f'n idiot.