Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack78
|
I asked you not to attack the messenger. It shows you can't refute the information.
Second, EVERY SOURCE HAS BIAS. Let me repeat: EVERY SOURCE HAS BIAS.
Let me prove my point. The author of your links is named: Michael Mann.
He's a Professor at Penn State. Law of averages: a democrat.
Proof? Of course: Here he is donating to john kerry's campaign:
Michael Mann Donations -- Huffington Post (fourth name down).
Next, one could make the case that ALL OF HIS POSTS AND PAPERS ARE INVALID.
Why? One of his major "achievements" was the "hockeystick" graph. It showed global temperatures over time.
Only problem was that Mann appears to have FUDGED THE DATA. He is guilty of the scientific equivalent of HERESY.
The Week That Was
Quote:
|
Mann et al. misused certain statistical methods in their studies, which inappropriately produce hockey stick shapes in the temperature history. Wegman’s analysis concludes that Mann’s work cannot support claim that the1990s were the warmest decade of the millennium.
|
BOOM!!!
So, to sum up, everyone has a bias. Your "proof" was given by a guy who manipulates data, is a democrat and who has a political agenda.
Now, shall we discuss the information on hand, or are too much of an intellectual weakling to accept you may be full of crap?