Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack78
Yes, it looks like an intentional case of "fudging heresy" to me ....  |
jack,
I'm getting pretty sick of your attitude.
I'm going to ask you some basic questions.
First, your response to me saying "I don't know" was to accuse me of putting my head in the sand.
Do you acknowledge that there may be some intelligent people who may come to different conclusions?
If yes, then would you retract the head in the sand accusation?
Second, do you acknowledge that it was you who brought the political into this discussion?
Third, do you acknowledge that some people may view your cherry-picking of sources as somewhat suspicious?
Fourth, do you acknowledge that bias occurs on both sides of the global warming equation?
Fifth, will you cease attacking the messenger as your primary defense against other viewpoints?
Sixth, will you acknowledge that your argument is harmed by admitting you don't read contrary viewpoints?
Seventh, do you really believe that we understand all the variables associated with climate change?
I'm going to await your responses to these questions. Then we will decide whether to continue. As it stands, you and I aren't having a discussion. I'm not interested in having a "pissing contest."