Quote:
Originally Posted by lars
You're dealing with a guy who collected his information from Green. He's pretty much a lightweight on the subject and you probably would be better off having this discussion with Green. If you can get Green to consider all aspects of the GW research going on and admit that scientists dont have this all figured out and that the models are not very good predictors. Then all the Green followers on this board might begin to be pushed (by Green himself) to be more objective. Right now, Jack can't admit anything because he will lose face (with Green and others here) and those same posters will not support him if he says something like 'well gee maybe you're right and there are some other legitimate research perspectives and questions about GW'.
|
I mean this in all seriously, lars, you couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried.
The Real Climate site is a blog were climate science issues are discussed & clarified by, surprise, climate scientists ... it isn't GS's site. I don't know what you and poly are reading but I've stated that Wegam had some worthwhile comments, and I also said that any work/conclusion generated by Mann, or any other scientist, that is found to have mistakes or shortcomings should be corrected. I can't be clearer than that - but of course that doesn't stop poly from charging off on a deranged "golden boy" tangent.
Also, for poly not to engage GS all along is pure sissy nonsense.
Now please bug out - you don't know WTF you're talking about, and you add absolutely zero.