Quote:
Originally Posted by Polynikes
One can only hope that the recent "outing" of the global warming fanatics, will lead to an honest and open discussion of the issue.
|
Which has been going on in the primary lit for the past 40+ years. Pay attention. Don't you also claim the "global cooling in the 70s" idea? Well how did scientific opinion shift? Oh maybe through open honest debate.
Speaking of honest where does oil money go? Not research, just PR. Ever wonder why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polynikes
The global warming high priesthood is either going to have to learn how to persuade others, or they will be just another footnote to history.
|
Fail pt II. "If the 'rhetoric' [insert scientists here] don't convince me, their data is worthless." Luckily you're not the gateway of science. And please, argue for the priesthood of thousands of scientists from around the globe that share the same impenetrable conspiracy that the most profitable companies in the world can't penetrate. I'm waiting. This should be good. Are there black helicopters?
Yeah they'll be a footnote. Doesn't matter if they're right of not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polynikes
Step two would be to stop pushing for an immediate and overwhelming U.S. GOVERNMENT response.
Those of us who don't rely on our cerebellum for rational thought, realize that the GOVERNMENT is rarely the best cure.
|
Fail pt 3: The validity of science does not rely on the gov having a cure.
You know, as with any theory from gravitation to evolution, climate change can be disproved. It can't be disproved by "there was no debate", "I'm not convinced", or "the gov can't fix it". You fail.
