Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenSpartan
 (BTW, the delay was because I was busy this week) More like sadness that people from my alma matter don't think rationally. You didn't address a single one of my points about Poly's irrelevant post. Your "report" is an opinion piece in a newspaper.
"rattled" in the opinion of a journalist - I show graphs of model predictions matched with data and you show...an opinion piece. Why don't you show the data how the models don't match?
"March temps" - weather is not climate
"growing number of scientists" - the young earth creationists have been making this claim for years. That doesn't give it any validity. If you have the data of those growing numbers you could easily cite the journal articles. |
Kinda like when I have posted scientific data that says exactly that 'data is not matching predictions' You don't address it. There is nothing inaccurate in this article. You're right it isn't scientific..but then again he is just 'reporting' current data from others. That doesn't make it irrelevant just a report on the current science.