Quote:
Originally Posted by JBSpartan4life
 that post made zero sense.
the recruits themselves are suppose to be scouted and ranked accordingly by analysts then they total up the points in said classes and rank them highest to lowest thus you have a ranking.
We're 7th right now on rivals thats pretty friggin good, we'll finish no lower then top 20 IMO so I'm not sure what your gripe is with rivals.
Scouts midwest rankings are ran by uofm dorks so I couldn't careless what they think. ESPN's garbage.
rivals has the most cred in football, according to them we're top 7 so no reason not to be happy. Over a dozen teams would have to start recruiting like hell between now and signing day to knock us out of the top 25 and I dont see that happening.
recent word is we'll sign 18-19 kids. With guys like koehne,sims,custis and others still out there for us. |
These rankings arent put out by the entire rivals network, theyre done by one analyst. In these, the writer is actually able to evaluate how talented the class is.
These are done by a computer system and depend largely on the number of commits. I realize the recruits are analyzed to contribute to the points system, but again quantity usually rules over quality in these.
Not that hard to grasp.