Quote:
Originally Posted by IndoSpartan
Wow '86 you really looked at this closely. I learned something. Is the text of this forum available yet?
|
I don't know about the text yet, Indo, I just watched the podcasts. I watched the first half of Obama twice and even took notes. It's just a great 'scientific' test, to give them the same questions in the same format and to compare their responses.
Some may have missed it, but McCain and Warren really had a personal, spiritual moment there at the beginning when McCain referenced the open paragraph of one of Warren's books, 'it's not about you', or something like that.
As I've said, my nephew has been close to Obama since his Senatorial campaign. That has helped me to start looking beyond traditional Christian right positions to try to see any virtue in what previously has been 'the godless left.' The justices thing really stumps me. I have thought of the Scalia faction as being both strict constructionists and oh, by the way, supportive of the correct political positions. I'm not sure how Obama comes down completely opposite. Is it plainly the politics of the justices' positions or is there really some deeper, interpretive framework at issue? I'm lost.
If it weren't concern for McCain and the neoconservatives, he'd probably get my vote. But, that alone disqualifies him, in my book. I've run across the goldmine of articles and videos of Seymour Hersh. Man, he says things...things you just don't say. Not to take the thread off track, but take a look at this:
YouTube - Zionists have bought out American politicians - Sey. Hersh