[RQA]

Originally Posted by Donnyrotten

All but one person at Parkland(20 something nurses and doctors) said his head had a huge wound in the back of it..and said this right soon after the event.Only much later did they change their minds, after having pressure put on them to do so(which several have come out and stated)


I believe this huge number of hospital staff are well aware of what a huge hole in the back of somebodies head looks like, and were virtually in unison right after the event describing it. Night and day difference between a pencil like wound(like the doctored autopsy photo depicts )and his whole head being blown off in the back, like over a score of eyewitnesses saw, many professionals.

Several secret service agents testified AT THE WARREN COMMISION that the back of his head was missing...what part dont you get.

The eye-witness testimony at Parkland was conflicting and confusing. As I noted previously it is doubtful that any of these witnesses actually saw the back of his head. But because eye-witness testimony is unreliable (have you ever studied any criminal justice?) we use other evidence to correlate some and eliminate other eye-witness testimony. So what do we do here?

Well, you can concoct a conspiracy that would involve those who selected the site of autopsy (the Kennedy family), well-respected doctors and technicians OR you can look at real evidence like this: which proves that the back of JFK's head was NOT blown out.

The huge wound was pasted over BECAUSE it proves he was shot from the front. Same with the small entrance wound in his throat, that doctors back east " wallowed out" to make it appear like an exit wound. the Dallas doctors didnt butcher his throat like that, and they reported only a small several millimeter in diameter entrance hole was there initially.

A shot from the front. Where is the entrance wound? Where was the shot taken from?

Oswald had the worst rating as a shooter you could get in the Marines and still pass, and he BARELY passed even at that.He was far from being a crack shot, he barely passed the minimum requirement to be a Marine, BARELY.

At some point you have to give up the lies. LHO scored as a sharpshooter, not the minimum required. Minimum to be a Marine was marksman.

There is no conclusive evidence showing he had sighted that cheap rifle in and even practiced with it, that i am aware of, that exists.

Irrelevant to the criminal investigation, but it is likely based on testimony from Marina that LHO did practice with his rifle.