Larry Johnson and Chad Johnson or Steven Jackson and Boldin

[Timmy2]

Which side would you rather have? Is the difference between SJ and LJ enough to compensate for the difference between Chad and Boldin?

FTR, I am very sour on my LJ pick (due to the constant eight man fronts and murderous schedule in weeks 2-5).

[Ozymandias]

SJ and Boldin

[hightothefield]

Originally Posted by Ozymandias

SJ and Boldin

I'd actually prefer the LJ/Chad combo. As far as defenses gearing up to stop LJ, he saw that all last year too.
Jackson will have a few hundred more all-purpose yards than LJ this year, but I'm not sold on Matt Leinart so I think Johnson will have a few hundred more yards and Boldin. So then it comes down to touchdowns. I Think Chad will have 11 or 12, and Boldin will have 7 or 8, meaning Jackson would need four more touchdowns than LJ to make up for it. I don't see that happening.

[izzo75]

Originally Posted by Timmy2

Which side would you rather have? Is the difference between SJ and LJ enough to compensate for the difference between Chad and Boldin?

FTR, I am very sour on my LJ pick (due to the constant eight man fronts and murderous schedule in weeks 2-5).

don't be the guy that trades away LJ when he is at his lowest point. He has a very nice schedule from week 6 on. Granted getting Jackson would be nice but you are giving up to much by throwing in CJ also. You would need a 3rd player on each side to even this deal out.

[DownSouthSpartan]

If you get point per reception then Jackson and Boldin is the better duo.