Obama Fans Crying Diebold Fix.

[ming]

Originally Posted by chachi

Please explain how it was taken out of context.

The CEO of the voting machines used in Ohio is committed to delivering the Ohio vote to the President...

He wasn't referring to rigging the election for Bush, he was referring to the level of financial support and dedication he had pledged to his candidate of choice... the exact same thing every political donor says about their candidate.

Originally Posted by chachi

Can you at least admit his statement shows a HUGE conflict of interest?

Yeah it was stupid and I'm sure he regrets it a 1000 times over. Our current political climate doesn't allow it.

[ming]

Originally Posted by chachi

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH...

Or, you just switch the memory cards in transit...

It is a hell of a lot easier than the BS outlined above.

Is someone writing this stuff down? There's a blockbuster Hollywood thriller in all this I tells ya!

[chachi]

Originally Posted by ming

Is someone writing this stuff down? There's a blockbuster Hollywood thriller in all this I tells ya!

Yeah... thriller... switch some SD cards.

[ming]

Originally Posted by chachi

Yeah... thriller... switch some SD cards.

I suppose the people transporting the cards will all be knocked out cold with one karate chop to the back of the neck? A switching of uniforms, the cards are delivered and the fix is on? Simple as that?

But what about when the people you knocked out wake up and inform the authorities? Or what about the fact that any altering of the code on the voting cards could be easily and quickly checked? Or will you just fade to black and roll credits before any of these possible repercussions derails your script?

[tuff bob]

Originally Posted by chachi

Or, you just switch the memory cards in transit... .

thank god its not possible to switch or lose a paper ballot box in transit

[chachi]

Originally Posted by tuff bob

thank god its not possible to switch or lose a paper ballot box in transit

It takes a hell of a lot more effort to print up a metric **** ton of bogus ballots, make the barcodes match, switch them out and destroy the old ones.

Or... switch a single card...

[tuff bob]

Originally Posted by chachi

It takes a hell of a lot more effort to print up a metric **** ton of bogus ballots, make the barcodes match, switch them out and destroy the old ones.

you're arguing its not worth the hassle to steal the election if its a paper ballot

[chachi]

Originally Posted by tuff bob

you're arguing its not worth the hassle to steal the election if its a paper ballot

No, I am saying it is a ton (haha) more effort with a much bigger... wait for it...





















paper trail. (haha)

[tuff bob]

Originally Posted by chachi

No, I am saying it is a ton (haha) more effort with a much bigger... wait for it...paper trail. (haha)

so what does that buy you?

[chachi]

Originally Posted by tuff bob

so what does that buy you?

A ham sandwich?

Bob, you have to admit... switching out cards is a hell of a lot easier than stuffing ballot boxes or replacing ballots.

[tuff bob]

Originally Posted by chachi

switching out cards is a hell of a lot easier than stuffing ballot boxes or replacing ballots.

assuming the carsd are unencrypted, which we've already been told is not the case. and you got to admit people have already gone to the effort of ballot box stuffing, or "losing" ballot boxes. so your point is meaningless. how much money is spent on a presidential election? its hundreds of millions. paper ballots do nothing to enhance the security because the payoff is worth the effort of stuffing boxes.