SpartanTailgate.com - Michigan State Spartans Forums Home MSU Headlines Forums Spartan Shop Donate Menu
 
Go Back   SpartanTailgate.com - Michigan State Spartans Forums > Other Forums > Wells Hall Off-topic Board

Wells Hall Off-topic Board Politics, Religion, and Social Issues. This board is your pulpit to preach to the masses (like the Wells Hall preacher) about everything from politics to religion. Please be kind to your fellow Spartans. Post as if your family is in the other computer.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 12:56 PM   #51 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lansing

Posts: 16,697

My Spartan is
Zeke the Wonderdog
It does surprise me that they do this s*** in an election year. Stuff like this is perfect to rile up the GOP base.
__________________
Tigers Bandwagon Member

R.I.P. Mr. Taco

F*** Hightower : F*** Wisconsin
WavSpartan is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 12:57 PM   #52 (permalink)
helmet
5,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 6,588

My Spartan is
#53 Greg Jones
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Joey View Post
Overturning Roe v. Wade won't make abortions illegal. Of course, you'd have to actually know something about the law to know that.
You get his point. A majority of Americans do not want to see it overturned, so attempting to get the SCOTUS to do it would be "judicial tyranny"
__________________
TheDoctorIsIn is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 12:58 PM   #53 (permalink)
helmet
1,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Joey View Post
Overturning Roe v. Wade won't make abortions illegal. Of course, you'd have to actually know something about the law to know that.
So do you think the Court would say that it isn't a constitutional right and turn it over to the states to regulate and ban if they see fit?

Or do you think they would consider a fetus a person for consitutional purposes and thus outlaw the practice of abortion all together?

If it is the former California might become the mecca of gay marriage and abortion.
Vagabond is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 12:58 PM   #54 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 18,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoctorIsIn View Post
You get his point. A majority of Americans do not want to see it overturned, so attempting to get the SCOTUS to do it would be "judicial tyranny"
Dollars to doughnuts says that a VAST majority of Americans either:

A) Doesn't know even know what Roe v. Wade is, or

B) Doesn't understand the ramifications of it being overturned
__________________
If you're lame enough to vote, vote for me.
Saint Joey: Tough on nerds, tougher on dorks.

"Uncivil language" free since 5/21/2005

Respecting your family since 10/21/2007

"First down, b****!" since 2000.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninowesco
Barak in '08
Saint Joey is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:01 PM   #55 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 18,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vagabond View Post
So do you think the Court would say that it isn't a constitutional right and turn it over to the states to regulate and ban if they see fit?

Or do you think they would consider a fetus a person for consitutional purposes and thus outlaw the practice of abortion all together?

If it is the former California might become the mecca of gay marriage and abortion.
I would expect the former.
__________________
If you're lame enough to vote, vote for me.
Saint Joey: Tough on nerds, tougher on dorks.

"Uncivil language" free since 5/21/2005

Respecting your family since 10/21/2007

"First down, b****!" since 2000.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninowesco
Barak in '08
Saint Joey is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:02 PM   #56 (permalink)
helmet
1,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Joey View Post
Dollars to doughnuts says that a VAST majority of Americans either:

A) Doesn't know even know what Roe v. Wade is, or

B) Doesn't understand the ramifications of it being overturned
I know one American who doesn't know what appeasement was

[IMG][/IMG]
Vagabond is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:02 PM   #57 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Jungleland, heading on up to the Cadillac Ranch

Posts: 10,132

My Spartan is
#21 Otis Wiley
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoctorIsIn View Post
You get his point. A majority of Americans do not want to see it overturned, so attempting to get the SCOTUS to do it would be "judicial tyranny"
Jokey just likes to be an ass instead of respecting his superiors....which would be anyone with his pulse.

I can't wait to see him justify banning gay marriage with an immigration or maritime law case.

If Roe is Overturned
Abortion will again be illegal in many states.
If Roe is overturned, a ban on abortion in all or most circumstances is likely in the many states dominated by anti-abortion majorities, particularly in the South. In thirty-one states, women are at risk of having their reproductive rights significantly restricted due to pre-existing bans (NARAL).
__________________
"Viet Cong is already plural. You wouldn't say Chineses." - Alpha Chino, Tropic Thunder

"If Sarah Palin did not exist, Stephen Colbert would have to invent her." - Andrew Sullivan

Last edited by Enrico Palazzo; 05-16-2008 at 01:16 PM.
Enrico Palazzo is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:03 PM   #58 (permalink)
helmet
5,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 6,588

My Spartan is
#53 Greg Jones
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Joey View Post
Dollars to doughnuts says that a VAST majority of Americans either:

A) Doesn't know even know what Roe v. Wade is, or

B) Doesn't understand the ramifications of it being overturned
Dollars to bite sized Donuts says that a VAST majority of Americans do not understand all of the ramifications of a gay marriage ban. Most believe it just stops them from getting a traditional marriage.
__________________
TheDoctorIsIn is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:05 PM   #59 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 18,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico Palazzo View Post
I can't wait to see him justify banning gay marriage with an immigration or maritime law case.
Oh, but I'm not against gay marriage. Ouch.

Sorry 'bout cha.
__________________
If you're lame enough to vote, vote for me.
Saint Joey: Tough on nerds, tougher on dorks.

"Uncivil language" free since 5/21/2005

Respecting your family since 10/21/2007

"First down, b****!" since 2000.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninowesco
Barak in '08
Saint Joey is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:05 PM   #60 (permalink)
helmet
1,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Joey View Post
I would expect the former.
So I guess that will mean that some will have to travel further for abortions than others.

Do you think it will hurt the Republicans to no longer have this issue on the table?


Abortion was a great issue for the Republicans because they didn't have to do a lot beyond talking and that got them tons of votes.
Vagabond is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:05 PM   #61 (permalink)
helmet
2,500+ posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the banks of the Red Cedar

Posts: 4,058

My Spartan is
Zeke the Wonderdog
Why are people talking about abortion and interracial crap? I thought this was about same sex marriage?

Anyway, I have no problem with gays. I have two gay friends. I don't even care if gays are married. How about we keep the debate about gay people getting married.
Ybob is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:15 PM   #62 (permalink)
helmet
500+ posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 913

My Spartan is
#7 Brian Hoyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ybob View Post
Why are people talking about abortion and interracial crap? I thought this was about same sex marriage?

Anyway, I have no problem with gays. I have two gay friends. I don't even care if gays are married. How about we keep the debate about gay people getting married.
You seem pretty apathetic about this. Go out and purchase an opinion.
G Norm Oosdyk is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 03:16 PM   #63 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Jungleland, heading on up to the Cadillac Ranch

Posts: 10,132

My Spartan is
#21 Otis Wiley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ybob View Post
Why are people talking about abortion and interracial crap? I thought this was about same sex marriage?

Anyway, I have no problem with gays. I have two gay friends. I don't even care if gays are married. How about we keep the debate about gay people getting married.
Well, in this decision the Supreme Court of CA leaned on the holding in the 1948 case that overturned the bans on interracial marriages. Basically they looked at the bans on prohibiting a type of marriage and decided they were similar and that there was no legal justification for upholding one ban yet overturning another.

Also, during the debate for an against interracial marriage many of the same arguments opponents of overturning the VA ban on interracial are used in the gay marriage ban: against tradition, not God's plan, unnatural, only for the purpose of physical gratification. That is why interracial marriage comes into play in this debate.
__________________
"Viet Cong is already plural. You wouldn't say Chineses." - Alpha Chino, Tropic Thunder

"If Sarah Palin did not exist, Stephen Colbert would have to invent her." - Andrew Sullivan
Enrico Palazzo is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 03:25 PM   #64 (permalink)
helmet
2,500+ posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the banks of the Red Cedar

Posts: 4,058

My Spartan is
Zeke the Wonderdog
Quote:
Originally Posted by G Norm Oosdyk View Post
You seem pretty apathetic about this. Go out and purchase an opinion.
I said I didn't care if they got married. That is my opinion... I don't need some guy getting paid way too much money on CNN to tell me what to think.
Ybob is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 03:41 PM   #65 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bagdad, AZ

Posts: 10,554

My Spartan is
Zeke the Wonderdog
I haven't been following this thread all day. (I've been working for once). But I was listening to PBS for a while in the car and they were talking about the gay marriage supreme court stuff and I got to thinking. Do I really give a **** if two homosexuals want to get married? Why should I care? Why should it matter who they marry, male or female. It's not like they're going to come force themselves into my life. It's their life and they can do what they damn well want to with it and government should stay the f out of it.
__________________
Charter member of the nObamaNation.
Statepug is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 03:46 PM   #66 (permalink)
helmet
5,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 6,588

My Spartan is
#53 Greg Jones
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statepug View Post
I haven't been following this thread all day. (I've been working for once). But I was listening to PBS for a while in the car and they were talking about the gay marriage supreme court stuff and I got to thinking. Do I really give a **** if two homosexuals want to get married? Why should I care? Why should it matter who they marry, male or female. It's not like they're going to come force themselves into my life. It's their life and they can do what they damn well want to with it and government should stay the f out of it.
That was kinda my feeling too. If you asked me several years ago what I thought of it, I'd say no way. But then someone asked me why I really care, and I didn't really have a reason other than instinctively feeling it was too far out of the norm. Just didn't seem right that my initial feeling about it should stop them from marrying.
__________________
TheDoctorIsIn is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 10:55 PM   #67 (permalink)
'86
helmet
2,500+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 2,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vagabond View Post
Sounds like apples to apples to me.

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. (Ephesians 6:5 )



Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed. If your master is a Christian, that is no excuse for being disrespectful. You should work all the harder because you are helping another believer by your efforts. Teach these truths, Timothy, and encourage everyone to obey them. (1 Timothy 6:1-2)

Quote:
20Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called.
21Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.
22For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant.
23Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.
24Brethren, let every man, wherein he is called, therein abide with God. - 1 Corinthians 7
The Bible gives individuals instructions about how to live within the institution of slavery, but that doesn't mean it condones slavery. The instruction is toward our personal lives, not the institutions. 'Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's'. That's what it says....
__________________
"...Marvel not that I said unto you, 'you must be born again'...."- Jesus Christ
'86 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:41 AM   #68 (permalink)
helmet
25+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 59
Comparison to interracial marriage is instructive

It seems pretty obvious that social morays are begining to shift on this topic, just as they did with interracial marriage 50 years ago. Here's a thought experiment:

The question: "Should marriage between homosexual partners be permitted"

Imagine what % of the pre-baby boomer population would answer the question yes vs what % of the post baby-boomer population would answer the question yes.

Of course the trouble with this experiment is we each get to make up our own statistics but to me it's pretty clear that the later generations would have a significantly higher percent of respondants answering yes.

Now project your answer fifty years into the future...I think that all fifty states will allow gay marriage. I also think that similar to interracial marriage today, some individuals will still find it unsettling
doc_spartan is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:49 AM   #69 (permalink)
helmet
5,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South Cackalackey ?

Posts: 5,679

My Spartan is
#65 Joel Nitchman
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc_spartan View Post
It seems pretty obvious that social morays are begining to shift on this topic, just as they did with interracial marriage 50 years ago. Here's a thought experiment:

The question: "Should marriage between homosexual partners be permitted"

Imagine what % of the pre-baby boomer population would answer the question yes vs what % of the post baby-boomer population would answer the question yes.

Of course the trouble with this experiment is we each get to make up our own statistics but to me it's pretty clear that the later generations would have a significantly higher percent of respondants answering yes.

Now project your answer fifty years into the future...I think that all fifty states will allow gay marriage. I also think that similar to interracial marriage today, some individuals will still find it unsettling
One can perform a similar thought experiment with adultery, polygamy, pedophilia, and beastiality. Perhaps the day will come when social mores shift to accept any sexual activity whatsoever.
__________________
Next to her resume, a guy who's done nothing but serve in the phony-baloney job of "community organizer" and write multiple autobiographies looks like just another creepily self-absorbed lifelong member of the full-time political class that infests every advanced democracy.
danb is online now
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:56 AM   #70 (permalink)
helmet
10,000+ posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Jungleland, heading on up to the Cadillac Ranch

Posts: 10,132

My Spartan is
#21 Otis Wiley
Quote:
Originally Posted by danb View Post
One can perform a similar thought experiment with adultery, polygamy, pedophilia, and beastiality. Perhaps the day will come when social mores shift to accept any sexual activity whatsoever.


wow, your stupidity and ignorance knows no bounds with this statement. You've lost the argument, time to pack it in instead of going down this road.

Whites marrying non-whites = beastiality? Gays marrying other gays = pedophelia?
__________________
"Viet Cong is already plural. You wouldn't say Chineses." - Alpha Chino, Tropic Thunder

"If Sarah Palin did not exist, Stephen Colbert would have to invent her." - Andrew Sullivan
Enrico Palazzo is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:58 AM   #71 (permalink)
helmet
25+ posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 59
Quote:
One can perform a similar thought experiment with adultery, polygamy, pedophilia, and beastiality. Perhaps the day will come when social mores shift to accept any sexual activity whatsoever.
Your point is applicable, and I suspect at least (I have no quote to back this) that the opponents of interracial marriage also made reference to this "slippery slope" type argument.

My post wasn't intended as a personal approval of homosexual marriage, merely to point out that the social conscious of the nation is shifting. It is also as you point out becoming more liberal on all forms of sexual activity. Personally I hope some of these take longer than others....with any luck I'll pass from the world before folks start marrying chickens.